#2 is probably the most powerful for me, given that I know the context for what’s going on – having to remove everything from the house must just be devastating.
John, Thanks for the feedback. I have several more frames but I probably won’t post them up. I’ll explain the reasoning later.
Regarding #3, that video was pretty funny. There have long been reports of people putting a child’s toy in disaster scenes for photo opportunities. I’m starting to think that a lot of them are planted because I had given up looking for one when I found Mickey.
I know #2 isn’t the shot that would grab most folks first but the more I looked at it the more I liked it. I wonder how it would have looked if I had used a small sensor camera? Would the nearly infinite DOF helped bring it home or would the added detail cluttered the shot?
Scary stuff; I don’t envy them for one moment
Regarding #3 – you should watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLZ1LT0kd-4
#2 is probably the most powerful for me, given that I know the context for what’s going on – having to remove everything from the house must just be devastating.
John, Thanks for the feedback. I have several more frames but I probably won’t post them up.
I’ll explain the reasoning later.
Regarding #3, that video was pretty funny. There have long been reports of people putting a child’s toy in disaster scenes for photo opportunities. I’m starting to think that a lot of them are planted because I had given up looking for one when I found Mickey.
I know #2 isn’t the shot that would grab most folks first but the more I looked at it the more I liked it. I wonder how it would have looked if I had used a small sensor camera? Would the nearly infinite DOF helped bring it home or would the added detail cluttered the shot?
#1. Are you by any chance using a TILT lens for this shot?